header title imageheader spacer image

PMO Practice Newsletter
Volume 2 Issue 1, Page 2

Ask the Expert Guest Author
HOW TO EFFECTIVELY LEVERAGE SUBJECT MATTER EXPERTS ON A PROJECT
By Michele Mills, PMP
IT Project Manager
University Health Care

Problem:

How many times have you facilitated a meeting with a group of subject matter experts only to find there is no consensus or "right" way to execute an activity?  Does each individual expert have their opinion regarding how to handle the task at hand?  Hopefully the end result is the same when you are confronted with this situation, but how do you know?  How do you know which path will get you there more efficiently with fewer errors and how do you decide on the best course of action with so many choices and variables in front of you?    

Successful project managers understand that subject matter expert (SME) relationships are vital to ensure they receive the best and most accurate information possible.   They quickly ascertain through investigation and experience which SME is the best “go to” person for each task or project activity in question.  They create a strong network and leverage the expertise within the project team and healthcare organization to successfully help manage their way through planning every detail.

Solution:

The best way to execute this is by involving several subject matter experts in your project very early on. The project initiation and planning phases is the time to “hammer out” the plan, discuss differences, reasoning, and negotiate agreements on process and review recommendations.  As the project manager, your role is to methodically evaluate all recommendations, weigh the pros/cons, consider the risks of each option and prepare documentation as a reference for why a specific strategy, path or direction is being taken.  

If you know and trust your SME’s based on previous successful project engagements, you are more likely to have a successful outcome.  So, what happens if you do not know the SME’s you are about to work with?   Then it is time to thoroughly do your homework!   Not knowing your entire team’s strengths and weaknesses, including your SME’s, will undoubtedly affect your project’s end-result.  It is your duty as the project manager to understand and challenge any and all recommendations you receive.  Blindly following what an SME tells you will become a risk in any project you are managing.  Even when working with resources you trust, verifying their information is a very important step in being a competent and diligent project manager.  Keep in mind, accountability is an important message to send as the project manager, but ultimately project success is your responsibility.  When you receive information that does not sound valid, it should be questioned.  Under certain conditions, it is necessary for the project manager to “dive” into the details.  You will most likely find this creates a strong rapport with your project team members and will positively position them next time to ensure the information they provide is well researched.  This may seem like common sense, but at times, project managers are so engrained and focused on meeting deadlines the most sensible approach in front of them can get lost. 

Example:

Recently, I worked with someone new to project management and was not confident working with IT subject matter experts.  After assessing the problem, I recognized there was a major gap in communication between the project manager and SME’s.  There were some levels of informal communication occurring, but no formal communication plan was established.  I started with this aspect of the project first because I fundamentally believe a solid communication plan is one of the most important assets to have for a project manager.  There are so many steps in the process, but missing out on formalizing communication is definitely not one the project manager wants to forget.  Communication throughout the project not only gives everyone the status’ they expect, but it also gets buy-in from all the stakeholders.  Communication is a way to hold each person accountable and responsible for the project only if the project manager is keeping them up to date on a continuous basis.  Under this scenario, all project participants are usually more willing to provide information because they feel as though they are a part of the process.  Based on my previous experience, I decided to target the communication gap first. 

After further assessing the issues, I realized another key problem was the project manager’s complete reliance on what the subject matter experts were recommending.   There was no real discussion about each task and recommendation.  There was no communication with outside stakeholders and users of the system to gather pertinent information about usage and workflow.   No list of risks for any of the recommendations had been prepared.   Because of this, many incorrect assumptions were made.   This neophyte project manager was following the lead of the SMEs, rather than leading the team.  It seemed simple to me at the time, but for a new project manager, this concept was not accepted practice yet.   Together, we talked with the SME’s and solicited additional details on their opinions and reasoning.  After analyzing the information, we came to the conclusion that some of the original data was flawed.   This “dissection” didn’t require a lot of time, but just a matter of asking the right questions and documenting the follow-up.  Once we accomplished these fairly simple and straight forward activities, it was not difficult to get the project back on the path to success.   In fact, after the communication plan was put into place many stakeholder expectations were recognized and accounted for.  Prior to this time, the project manager was receiving frequent complaints about the overall project.    With the simple introduction of a communication plan, consistent communication and a review of the SME recommendations, the project manager received praise for the work.    The project went live without a hitch and the new project manager learned a valuable lesson about project management. 

Conclusion:

The bottom line on any project is that no one person is always right.  A high performing and successful project manager accepts this and will entertain, when applicable, outside opinions to ensure the best decision is being made.  As project managers, we should never assume we know it all, nor should we believe our SME’s have every answer.  Always ask questions, probe the details and educate yourself.  As project managers we are expected to run the project and leverage our SME’s to be effective.  You will undoubtedly stumble on many terms and scenarios that are new.  We know this because by definition every project has a definite start and stop and are typically unique by nature to meet a new business or market need.  Always keep in mind that the best project managers are inquisitive, ask good questions and know how to drive towards positive, productive, measurable customer focused end-results.